Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Review Mad - by Vivienne



In 2005, after the release of Judd Apatow-produced movie Knocked Up, Katherine Heigl gave an interview in which she called the movie ‘a little sexist’, saying that it painted the women as ‘shrews, as humourless and uptight’ and painted the men as lovable, goofy, fun-loving guys. Since then, there have been many accusations from reviewers that comedies produced by Judd Apatow (such as Knocked Up, The 40 Year Old Virgin, Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Superbad) are sexist due to their portrayal of women and endorsement of characters who are complete jerks.


I think it’s safe to say that yeah, they are a little sexist. Most of the women in the 40 Year Old Virgin are portrayed as drunk skanky nut-cases whereas the men (some of whom are clearly arseholes) are the heroes of the story. And then there’s Superbad, where one of the main characters has got to be the biggest arsehole on the planet and the women are mostly portrayed as drunk skanks (with the exception of one, who still appears to be stupid enough to go for one of the jerks).



This whole “Unnatractive loser gets with hot girl” scenario has been there in almost all of Apatow’s films. It’s all about wish-fulfillment. Female-based romantic comedies always have some sort of crazy wild romantic moment towards the end which would never happen in real life, but women wish they would. Same with Apatow movies. In real life, girls like Emma Stone would never go for guys like Jonah Hill. In real life guys would never get away with the crazy jerk stuff they do in these films.


In fact, here’s a parody song about it from CollegeHumor.com:

Really Long Link

Here’s the thing though – even though the movies are a little sexist, it doesn’t actually bother me. Why? Because a lot of female-based romantic comedies do the same thing. Not the good ones, mind you, but it’s been done. Think of the monstrosity that was Bride Wars. The men were practically treated like crap throughout the whole thing, and portrayed as useless and annoying. When the wedding planner asked the two main characters if they’d like to consult their fiancés about the dates, they immediately said “no” without hesitation, which of course was supposed to get a laugh from the audience. It’s sexist when the men do it, but if women do it, nobody complains.

Apatow movies also seem to have started another trend – making movies about jerks that we laugh with, not laugh at. Remember Stiffler in American Pie? The guy was a jerk – but we laughed AT him and how pathetic he was, not WITH him. Apatow movies try and make us sympathise with the jerks, like Seth from Superbad and Jay from The 40 Year Old Virgin. We should be laughing at them but instead they’ve made us laugh with them. Is that really a good thing? To be honest I’m not sure. Apatow movies have paved the way for other jerk-based comedies, like The Hangover, which we women laugh at but then feel immense guilt afterwards.



Don’t get me wrong – I love Apatow movies. The 40 Year Old Virgin and Superbad are both hilarious, and I did also enjoy Forgetting Sarah Marshall. Sometimes when I see something really sexist in these movies I cringe, but then I just remember that we can be just as bad with our movies at times.

-That Aussie Girl
22
Vote
   


Review - Star Trek

May 28th 2009 14:21


When Star Trek came out in cinemas I was indifferent to the idea of going to go see it. After all I didn’t know anything about Star Trek. Then the reviews started pouring in on rottentomatoes.com, my friends went and saw it, and said it was fantastic. I figured I should probably go see it – and I’m really glad I did.

I may know little to nothing about Star Trek, but I do know that this movie is awesome as a movie in its own right. Almost everything about it was done impeccably. It had a great script, excellent casting, top-notch special effects... in fact, just think of the movie as a list of qualities that need to be checked off.

Script – Check.
Casting – Check.
Acting – Check.
Special Effects – Check.
Score – Check.
Production Design – Check.

Practically everything has done right here. The casting is fantastic. Chris Pine kicks arse as Kirk, and Zachary Quinto is surprisingly good as Spock, who ended up becoming one of my favourite characters. I mean dude, he’s half human half Vulcan – a race which wipes away all their emotions. He feels more emotion than most Vulcans but still doesn’t show it much. So as an actor, Quinto has to convey emotion without conveying emotion. That’s pretty damn hard, and he pulled it off very well. I also loved Simon Pegg as Scotty, who was pretty lovable and funny. And even though I haven’t seen any of the original Star Trek movies, I can definitely appreciate the awesomeness that is Leonard Nimoy as Old Spock. I mean it’d kinda be like William Shatner walking in and randomly waving, only more awesome. Nimoy goes well beyond a cameo, and we love the movie for it.

The writing is great. It’s been a long time since I’ve been to the cinemas and seen a good solid plot that hooked me in from the moment I started watching. It doesn’t treat its audience like they’re idiots, but also works well for the uninitiated (like me). It’s well-structured, interesting and has some pretty funny dialogue to boot. (Are you out of your Vulcan mind?)

Some people said they didn’t like the score, but personally I loved it. To me it sounded like the awesomeness of Indiana Jones and Star Wars combined, especially in the opening where we first see the title of the movie. Although to be fair I know little to nothing about music. If you want to correct me, feel free.

Overall, this movie kicked arse. If you’re into Sci-Fi and Adventure movies, go see it. If you suck, don’t go see it.



Four and a half stars.
37
Vote
   




No Reservations is an unsuccessful Romantic Comedy starring Catherine Zeta-Jones, Abigail Breslin and Aaron Eckhart. The story focuses on Kate (played by Zeta-Jones) an uptight and anti-social gourmet chef who becomes a guardian to her niece Zoe (Breslin) after her sister dies in a car-crash. On top of her struggles to be an adequate parental figure, her work-life changes dramatically when a Sous Chef named Nick (Eckhart) is hired, who is just as loose and bubbly as she is wound-up and cold. Can this charismatic Sous Chef melt Kate’s heart? You bet your poor screenplays he can.

This might be a movie where you’d think it’s alright the first time, but then when you watch it again you realize how terrible it is. The script is awful, the directing is sloppy and there are way too many musical sequences attempting to pad out the storyline. There are parts where you can tell the director told them to ad lib their dialogue while they play some random song over it. It's like the directer thinks no one minds if the characters are saying things like "Yeah sure uh huh right oh really yep uh huh" during crucial character-developing moments as long as there's pleasant music playing over it. Some of the montage sequences are painful, particularly the ones involving the three main characters riding three-person bikes and playing in photo-booths.



Catherine Zeta-Jones does a good job as Kate, and Aaron Eckhart is also well-cast as the male lead. The problem is that characters like Aaron Eckhart's Nick don't actually exist in real life. So instead of watching the movie thinking “Aaw, he’s so dreamy..” we’re thinking “Pfft, yeah right!”. If guys like Nick existed, they wouldn't be single, and they'd never fall for uptight bitches like Kate. He's basically the Gary-Stu creation of a lonely writer. He's good in the kitchen, he's funny, he's insanely good looking, he likes romantic music, he's loyal, and he's good with kids.

And here's another thing that really annoys me about this film - Kate is always leaving her niece alone with random guys. Why would a character who has massive trust issues let their date pick up their niece, take them to bed alone and tuck them in? Why would a character who has massive trust issues tell their single mid-thirties neighbour to come inside their house several times a night to check on their niece and make sure she's still tucked in? Who wouldn't freak the hell out when they open the door to their own house and find this guy in there? Anyone who has ever watched an episode of Oprah would know that's where the warning bells start going off. Sure it's an extremely unfair stereotype. Not all guys over the age of thirty who play with children that aren't their own are paedofiles. Some people are just NICE. But seriously, leaving your kids alone with strangers in general is a really bad idea. Bad writers! Shame on you.

In a nutshell, this movie is not worst movie I’ve ever seen, but I'm not recommending it to anyone any time soon. The cast try their best to make it a worthwhile movie, but in the end it never comes up to scratch. It's not the worst, but it’s still pretty terrible.

Two stars.



This is That Aussie Girl, signing off.
40
Vote
   




A friend from uni once told me that he reckoned the greatest movie ever would be one where a bunch of people were stuck in a labyrinth filled with loads of zombies and monsters, and they all had to blow the shit out of each other - and the whys and hows would never be acknowledged. With that in mind, I think he'd absolutely LOVE Planet Terror. The movie is basically about a bunch of extremely hot people grabbing a bunch of weapons and blowing the shit out of a bunch of zombies. Normally I'd be saying this as if it were a bad thing - but for some reason... I...LIKED it.

This movie is an affectionate tribute to the cheesy exploitation films of the 1970s and also to the whole zombie movie genre in general. The acting is crazy and over-the-top, the effects are purposely terrible (I loved all the jam and ketchup coming from the exploding zombies) and some of the cleavage shots are hilariously gratuitous. Everyone is extremely good-looking and fierce - you won't find any wimps or flaky damsels in distress in this movie. Part of me wanted to go "How much time does Cherry have to keep re-applying her lipstick while she's fighting zombies?" but the other part was going "DON'T QUESTION THE LOGICS. SHE LOOKS AWESOME."

In fact, Cherry herself is probably one of the highlights of this movie. Rose McGowan does an excellent job as the Film Noir good-girl-trapped-in-a-bad-wo rld archetype, with just the right amount of overacting. Cherry as a character is pretty fun to watch. She's tough, fierce and could even give Jessica Rabbit a run for her money in terms of hotness. And I'm pretty sure that if a straight girl like me can be completely captivated by Cherry's awesomeness, I'm sure there are going to be alot of male jaws hitting the floor at the mere sight of her dancing in the opening scene.

Still don't believe me? Check out that scene right now on youtube.

Really Long Link

I think one of my favourite scenes is where Cherry blows the shit out of a bunch of zombies, dodges a bomb with a back-arch and then poses dramatically with a pair of glasses she finds. It's just so over-the-top and yet so awesome at the same time. In fact I just love the whole Cherry-having-a-gun-for-a-leg thing. It's like that conversation I had with my friend from uni. I could just imagine him saying "They should make a movie about a chick with a gun for a leg, and she blows the shit out of zombies and stuff." Like I said, he'd love this movie.

Now even though I did enjoy the film, I've got to say that the grainy image quality was pretty annoying. At first it was kinda endearing but after a while it just got irritating, and it's a good thing that they toned it down after a while. I'd love to give this movie more than three and a half stars. The casting was great, Robert Rodriguez seemed to be having a shitload of fun directing, and Cherry makes me want to go out and buy lipstick. However, my main problem with the film is that the first twenty minutes were kinda slow and more strange than entertaining. The movie didn't get REALLY good til about half-way. It's a shame, because if those first twenty minutes had been as good as the last twenty minutes, the movie could have been amazing.

Bottom line is - if you love crazy old horror movies that are full of camp value, old zombie movies, Tarantino films, movies with really hot girls who blow shit up, or really obscure movies from the 60s and 70s, you'll love this movie. If not, give it a miss.



This is That Aussie Girl, signing out.
37
Vote
   


The Day the Earth Stood Still (Remake)

January 10th 2009 04:14
This felt more like time standing still in this failed attempt to remake the Sci Fi classic movie the Day the Earth Stood Still. The director attempts to make us care for the characters at the start of the film creating a back story and an emotional arc of Jacob Benson’s father having died and the emotional connection between his step mother Jennifer played by Jennifer Connelly. But the movie just falls flat with a slow moving plot and many opportunities for intense action sequences are missed. Some of the casting decisions are absurd with John Cleese having a minor and insignificant role and Kathy bates was miss casted she did not fit into the movie at all. Keanu Reeves was the only highlight of the film working his best with the poor material he had he brought a vulnerability Klaatu with his performance actually evoking sympathy and having the audience care for the character. John Hamm was a long way from his outstanding work on Mad Men and was let down by a slow paced script. It was disappointing to have the central alien enemy Gort on screen for a limited amount of time with too much focus on the stereotypical military response, Gort could have been used to create intense battle sequences against the military that were sorely missing from this movie. Another failed attempt at a remake of a classic film.
44
Vote
   


Transformers

December 15th 2008 00:14
You could almost hear the groans from die hard Transformers fans when it was announced Michael Bay would be directing the Transformers movie, would this turn out to be another Pearl Harbour fiasco? The answer was thankfully no and fans were treated to an adrenaline fuelled rush that did not disappoint from beginning to end. Fans could have only dreamed that their favourite toys and cartoon characters could be brought to life by state of the art special effects with such attention to detail as we watched Optimus Prime transform before our eyes. The movie in many respects strayed away from the cartoon’s original premise as Megatron was now not a gun as depicted in the cartoon series but now a more futuristic machine that allowed for a more menacing villain that suited the direction Michael Bay has gone with his adaptation of the franchise. Shia LaBeouf was a stand out as Sam Witwicky bringing a charismatic and comedic charm to the role. The story had a strong premise with carefully woven stories that intersected with each other.The movie has wide appeal brining about a new generation of Transformers fans and allowing others to reminisce about days spent watching the cartoons or playing with the action figures. Michael Bay’s trade mark fast paced action reputation was appropriate for the film, with unforgettable action sequences that sees downtown street ripped to pieces by waring Cybertrons and Decepticons and characterisation has not been sacrificed with characters that are easily relatable to the audience. The film is of course left open for the upcoming sequel, as this movie has clearly begun a successful franchise that will stand the test of time.
48
Vote
   


Iron Man Review

December 6th 2008 22:47
Many people go into a comic book movie with a great deal of trepidation and Iron Man was no exception, could this classic comic book character be tarnished by an adaptation to the big screen? The involvement of Robert Downey Jnr was also a concern, but all those worries were laid to rest as the movie began. Stunning visual effects were evident, but did not distract away of what was an engaging story of the origins of Iron Man. This proved to revitalise Downey’s career as he soared with his charismatic performance as Tony Stark and Gwenth Paltro surprised as her portrayal as the vulnerable Pepper Potts and they both showed terrific chemistry together as their relationship develops. Jon Favreau successfully adapted this film to the big screen creating dynamic layered characters and a sense of adrenalin as the story explores Tony Stark’s transformation into Iron Man as he is betrayed by Obadiah Stane played by Jeff Bridges. Humor is also injected into the film providing comic relief adding to the movie’s sense of fun. The film’s wide appeal has given people unfamiliar with Iron Man a chance to discover and enjoy this comic book icon and giving dedicated fans the satisfaction that Iron Man has been successfully conveyed to the big screen.
57
Vote
   


24 Redemption Review

December 6th 2008 22:45
24 fans have eagerly awaited the premier of the 24 telemovie, a prequel designed to bridge the gaps between seasons 6 and 7, as they have endured the last year without new episodes thanks to the writer’s strike. The movie does not disappoint as the writers have gone back to the twist and turns and adrenalin fuelled stories that were absent during the 6th season. The story is set in Africa, with mesmerising cinematography of the African landscape that is a significant departure from the usual Los Angeles location. The story centers on Jack Bauer who has travelled to Africa for humanitarian work where he becomes involved within a military coup to recruit children into a rising army in the fictional town of Sangala. The movie also begins to set up events of the next season with the inauguration of the show’s first female president played by the delightful Cherry Jones and introducing a US conspiracy connected to the situation in Africa lead by Jon Voight. Production values are that of a feature length movie are evident as Keifer Sutherland continues his unique portrayal of Jack Bauer conveyed against the African setting and presenting a softer side of the character with his interaction to the children. The only downside to the film is the absence of key players such as Chloe played by Mary Lynn Rajskub and Bill played by James Morrison. The telemovie sticks to the real time format taking place over two and it delivers from beginning to end, and wets the appetite for what is yet to come next season.
48
Vote
   


Star Wars Clone Wars Review

December 6th 2008 22:43
The one question I have of this movie is why was this made? Was it George Lucas’ greedy thirst for money or his genuine attempt to tell more stories? Turning Star Wars into an animated adventure should have brought the fun back into Star Wars but instead was the first time I have ever been embarrassed to be a Star Wars fan. With George Lucas’ love affair with special effects clearly evident with the movie, and while there is no disputing that the special effects that were inspired by the likes of the Thunderbirds were impressive, that does not distract away from the movie’s flaws. The story follows Anikan Skywalker and introduces his Padwan, Ahsoka as they fight against Count Dooku and Asajj Ventress to rescue Jabba the Hutt’s son, referred to as ‘Stinky’, which is quite an appropriate term to describe this film. Ahsoka proves to be a general annoyance throughout the whole film constantly referring to R2- D2 as r-twoey and brining about much of the childish humor that is obviously generated at a younger audience completely alienating die hard Star Wars fans. The film takes a most bizarre turn with the introduction of Jabba the Hutt’s uncle who for some unknown reason turns out to be a cross-dressing hut; this was the point where the movie could not be saved. While this was obviously just the pilot to launch the television series, this is not just a disappointment for true Star Wars fans but for anyone looking for an enjoyable family movie, maybe this should have been saved for the smaller screen.
75
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
1 Posts
9 Posts dating from December 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Vivienne 's Blogs

27 Vote(s)
2 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
Moderated by Vivienne
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]